Greenroom
Conference program management: the call for papers, the review, and the schedule.
Conference organisers run their programme on software that costs on the order of $40,000 a year. Greenroom replaces the part they spend the most time inside — collecting abstracts, deciding which ones make it, and turning the accepted ones into a schedule that isn't impossible.
Everything below is a real event with seeded data: one conference, 61 submissions, a review panel that genuinely disagrees with itself, and a schedule with real clashes in it. Nothing needs a sign-in. Change anything you like.
See what the committee disagrees about
Every review tool computes an average. This one shows the spread as a bar with the mean marked on it, flags the abstracts reviewers split on as Contested, and lets you sort by disagreement rather than by score — because that is the list you actually take into the meeting.
43 fields, and you choose which ones
Filter, sort, and act on 48 abstracts and 13 sessions across 43 fields, with a column picker, saved views and bulk actions. Abstracts and sessions are separate tabs because they are separate pipelines: sponsor and keynote sessions skip evaluation entirely and go straight to the schedule.
Submit a talk, as a speaker would
The call for papers exactly as a speaker sees it. Fill it in and submit — your talk appears in the grid behind card two, with the fields you typed.
The same conference, from the speaker's side
The speaker portal, as one of the submitters behind card two sees it. A decision reaches a speaker when you notify them, not when you make it — so deciding and telling are separate steps, and an organiser can settle a whole queue before anyone hears anything.